Young Earth Creationism (YEC) affirms that God created the universe, the earth, and all life in six ordinary days, only thousands, not billions of years ago. This view arises not from scientific minimalism, but from a commitment to take Scripture seriously, beginning with its plain meaning and allowing it to shape our understanding of history, nature, and humanity.

Scripture as the Starting Point

The Bible opens with a clear historical claim: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1). The text does not read like poetry or allegory, but like a chronological account of real events. Each day of creation is marked by “evening and morning,” indicating ordinary days rather than long epochs.

The creation week culminates in God’s evaluation of His work: “God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31). A “very good” creation leaves little room for millions of years of death, disease, and extinction prior to humanity, features often required by old-earth models.

Creation and the Fourth Commandment

The Ten Commandments reinforce a literal reading of Genesis. In grounding the Sabbath, God Himself explains: “For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth” (Exodus 20:11). The human workweek mirrors God’s creative work, implying that both consist of the same kind of days.

Death, Sin, and the Gospel

Young Earth Creationism also preserves the biblical connection between sin and death. Scripture teaches that “through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin” (Romans 5:12). If death existed for ages before Adam, then death is no longer the consequence of sin, and the theological foundation of the gospel is weakened.

The Global Flood and Earth’s History

The Bible describes a worldwide Flood in the days of Noah, a catastrophic event with massive geological consequences. Peter refers to this judgment, noting that “the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water” (2 Peter 3:6). YEC proponents argue that this event explains much of the fossil record and large-scale sedimentary layers more consistently than slow, uniform processes alone.

Faith, Reason, and Humility

Young Earth Creationism does not reject science; rather, it challenges assumptions that exclude God’s direct action and eyewitness revelation. Scripture, as God’s Word, provides a trustworthy historical framework within which scientific observations can be interpreted.

In the end, YEC is about trust, trust that God has spoken clearly, truthfully, and authoritatively about our origins. When Scripture is allowed to speak for itself, it presents a coherent account of a young creation that glorifies God as Creator, Judge, and Redeemer.


Discover more from The Anchor Gospel Ministry

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 responses to “A Case for Young Earth Creationism”

  1. Hello Nathan
    I don’t want to critisise, as I read your emails daily and find them good. On this topic though, I wanted to offer an alternative Bible-based point of view – I can’t see that the Bible says that the “In the beginning” (verse 1) is necessarily 1 day before “The earth was without form and void” in verse 2 – this leaves scope for the earth to have been created millions of years prior, and it was only the present day earth with it’s life that we know it, that was then created in 7 days – what do you think? Verse 5 of Genesis 1 refers to “the first day”, but I’m not sure that it’s very clear whether that’s referring back to verse 3 (let there be light), or verse 1 (In the beginning)…
    I agree all things are possible with God, but I also think that there’s a lot of stuff we don’t know and God doesn’t necessarily mean us to know (not during our lives here on earth anyhow!), and I’m wondering if the answer to this question is 1 of them.
    However, I would value and respect your comments on this?

    Daniel

    Like

    1. Thank you for your thoughtful and gracious comment – and for engaging with Scripture so carefully. I also appreciate your daily readership and encouragement.

      You are correct that Genesis 1:1 does not explicitly state a time interval between verse 1 and verse 2, nor does the text define verse 1 as occurring exactly 24 hours before verse 2. The Hebrew construction of Genesis 1:1 functions grammatically as a superscription or summary statement of God’s initial act of creation, rather than being labelled as the first numbered creation day. The numbered days (yom, “day”) begin formally in verse 3 with God’s first creative command, “Let there be light.”

      Regarding Genesis 1:5, the phrase “the first day” (yom echad) most naturally refers to the completed light–dark cycle described from verses 3–5, not verse 1. This is because:

      The evening–morning formula that defines each creation day first appears in verse 5, after light is created and separated from darkness.

      The text does not apply the “first day” label to verse 1 or 2.

      The day structure is tied to God’s spoken creative acts, which begin in verse 3, not the statement of verse 1.

      That said, your proposed interpretation aligns broadly with what is known as the “gap theory” or “ruin–reconstruction view,” which allows for an undefined period between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. While this view has been held by some sincere believers historically, it is important to note:

      The text itself does not explicitly teach a long chronological gap.

      Nor does it clearly describe a prior world being judged and then recreated.

      The simplest reading of the chapter presents God forming and filling His original creation in an ordered sequence without mentioning interruption or pre-Adamic history.

      Concerning your point about scientific unknowns, I agree fully: there are limits to what Scripture reveals, and limits to human knowledge. God tells us what we need to know for faith and obedience, not always what we might be curious about. It is wise and humble to recognise mystery where the text leaves it open.

      Where I would gently differ from a strict gap reading is here: although the Bible does not specify a timeline in verses 1–2, it also does not clearly frame verse 1 as describing a different creation system from the seven days that follow. The literary and grammatical markers that define the seven days do not reach back to verse 1, which suggests verse 1 stands outside the 7-day structure, but not necessarily outside the same creation narrative.

      So, to summarise the key conclusions:

      Genesis 1:1 is not labelled as a 24-hour creation day.

      The seven numbered days begin in verse 3.

      Genesis 1:5 refers to the light/dark cycle of verses 3–5.

      A long gap is not ruled out grammatically, but it is not explicitly stated.

      Scripture allows for mystery, and humility is appropriate in areas where God has not given detail.

      Your interpretation is sincerely held, Bible-engaged, and worth discussing, even if I land at a more straightforward reading of the text. I respect the heart behind your question, and I hope this helps bring clarity without dismissing the reality of divine mystery.

      Thank you again for raising this with such kindness and care for God’s Word.

      Like

Leave a comment

Latest posts

Discover more from The Anchor Gospel Ministry

Receive articles in your inbox by subscribing below. Unsubscribe at any time.

Continue reading